August 23, 2011

Send a pyromaniac to extinguish a fire, burning the forest to save trees, save to bomb the civilian population, launching campaigns of terror in the name of fighting terrorism, promote democracy by supporting dictators, monarchies, other gangsters and terrorists of all kinds. .. the logic of Western leaders is unstoppable.

... During this time, the organization of the mass media bombard the consciousness until its surrender. And that's how you wake up one day with the feeling that has always been in favor of privatization. With the belief that the Taliban have always been our enemies. That Europe is the only one worth it. You understand very well that you can not afford your retirement. And NATO is a kind of international service ambulances.

Today, August 21, the latest news: "The rebels entered Tripoli." After weeks of "the Libyan rebels advance", "the rebels control the city of ...", the" rebels announce ...". It's funny how the main actor of these events, NATO, can become quiet on the news.

To see the difficulty that these rebels had to move in a flat country, a little village where his teachers have had and the dominance of the skies - ideal conditions for such a campaign - and where (supreme advantage) the people would be "supportive of its cause, "is evident and clear that the" Libyan rebels "will never accounted for much, coming to kill each other and eliminate their own commander in chief (and that the" ideal "conditions).
That said, unless there is a coup de theater, they will "win" sooner or later, that's right. How could it be otherwise? When the baton round of advertising does not enter the square hole of reality, NATO is in charge of rounding the corners.

We bet you will not miss some shadows then brutalized for wallowing in our screens to shout "we won!" And to say that a few months ago they could barely pronounce the name of the country. But the truth is that history has proven that they were wrong, that they err, and the question of "war" will not change that.

Tripoli resist? How long? Hours, days? And suddenly the stakes are open and we have now designed the lottery site. They speak no doubt "Gaddafi supporters" (a number) and never "the Libyans opposed to imperialist intervention" (probably more numerous). They show us some footage of crowds rejoicing. They use picture taken once in Baghdad? 6000 they finally find the Libyans killed "by the regime" or change the subject, as in the case of weapons of mass destruction?

Therefore, "if you win." The question that intrigues me is who is the "if" and what will have been "won." It's crazy how systematically evades this issue interesting. I know that this "is" not me, nor you (whatever your opinion on this NATO operation). I also know that is not the overwhelming majority of Libya who certainly had a different idea of the Arab spring.

This morning (August 21), the press tells us that a rebellious elite brigade is impatient at the gates of Tripoli. She explains without hesitation that some of the 600 men have "dual nationality American and Libyan" ... your boss says "with a strong Irish accent," a "sniper" who "spent most of his life in Dublin," which is "in permanent contact with NATO forces." And I say: "there is, even a Libyan to direct a brigade of elite rebellion?". And: "If it's not mercenaries, they seem wildly." But the idea does not wander in my mind because the place was already occupied by this other idea recently hammered by the media: Gaddafi is employing mercenaries ("blacks and drug addicts").

Yes, now we have an indication that "they" won: a Libyan pure, as there is the tribes. He wears Ray Ban, chewing-gum chewing, speaking with a strong Irish accent and his Libyan passport is probably very beautiful, brand new and has yet to smell the fresh paint. And I have the feeling that if you asked confused "and Baghdad, as it was?" He would answer "no comment".

So, after months of bombing every kind, have to surrender the evidence. And to say that I no longer doubt that the history of humanitarian intervention.

PS: last minute, in the category of "they dare everything." A NATO spokesman says that the Alliance's mission is to protect the civilian population and not take sides for one of two camps. Orwell, you're an amateur.

Source